Re: Apple Representation On WebObjects-Dev Mailing List?
Re: Apple Representation On WebObjects-Dev Mailing List?
- Subject: Re: Apple Representation On WebObjects-Dev Mailing List?
- From: "Robert B. Hanviriyapunt" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:45:27 -0500
How about the continued availability of WO. People can SAY that Apple
relies heavily on WO and thus it won't go away, but again it just
feels more secure knowing that it is officially true, and that WO will
always be kept out there so that I can put away my doubts that it will
suddenly disappear. I'd just feel safer while we're all building on
this platform that it won't be pulled from under us.
On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Jesse Tayler wrote:
there has been official word-- you just gotta go back ten years and
ask ernie prabhakar or something.
seriously, the official word is that WO is and shall remain WO and
will never be open sourced or whatever.
I opine as well, but that's the way it is and shall be.
On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote:
Who, if anyone, represents Apple on this mailing list? When it
comes to questions of open-sourcing WO or the availability of WO,
the answer should be posted by an Apple official rep. in this
mailing list. Anyone can opine, but I think the group benefits
greatly when an official word is heard -- second best to that is an
"insider", even if not officially charged by Apple to represent in
the list.
Thoughts anyone?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden