Re: Use EOF without WO?
Re: Use EOF without WO?
- Subject: Re: Use EOF without WO?
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:58 -0400
Yeah, I guess I should clarify my position to be "I second 'not eof'" :)
ms
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Michael Gargano wrote:
> While Cayenne is very similar to EOF prepare for a SUPER buggy modeling tool. It's really not ready for prime time.
> my 2 ยข
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> I second Cayenne ... You're definitely in a legal quagmire translating EOF to dalvik. I would recommend not even TRYING to go down this road with EOF. Even if you make it work, it's just not worth the legal risk shipping an actual product on it.
>>
>> ms
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Amy Worrall wrote:
>>
>>>> 1) JavaFoundation requires some small tweaks to the binary for it to be used
>>>> successfully by android
>>>
>>> Thanks ever so much for the sample project. It looks really useful.
>>> I'll have a chance to play with it more tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Out of interest, what did you have to do to Foundation?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Amy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden