• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Use EOF without WO?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use EOF without WO?


  • Subject: Re: Use EOF without WO?
  • From: Michael DeMan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:17:56 -0700

Hi Amy,

ManagedObjectContext on iOS is a similar, but different animal than EOEditingContext on server-side java.

At the end of the day, EOF is most likely the reason that WebObjects was never completely open sourced some years after NeXT got Apple back and it no longer was even remotely any kind of significant revenue stream.  Hence from there however, the technology was leveraged by Apple into iOS.

I would expect that Apple considers CoreData a competitive advantage for the iOS platform, and given its history from EOF, and just being done right in the first place, completely makes sense.  I also imagine at some point there will be similar developer frameworks for Android but most likely they will be a few years out and probably still less elegant given the mindset I have seen from Google frameworks like GWT and such.

Just my 2-cents.

- Mike

On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Amy Worrall wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jesse Tayler <email@hidden> wrote:
>> what is it really that you need to be removed?
>> you don't want to use the monitor and load balance or taskd stuff? or you
>> can't install something in some environment?
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> This is the point I confess I'm trying to do something a little crazy…
> I work for an iOS development house and we've been asked to do an
> Android port of an app. My boss tasked us with finding the closest
> thing to Core Data that will run on Android. What's similar to Core
> Data and written in Java? Hmmm…
>
> It might come to nothing: it might end up being easier just rewriting
> it with a simpler Java ORM instead. But as I've been wanting to spend
> more time learning WebObjects anyway, I thought it couldn't hurt to
> see if this was possible.
>
> Amy
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Use EOF without WO? (From: Amy Worrall <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use EOF without WO? (From: John Huss <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use EOF without WO? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use EOF without WO? (From: John Huss <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use EOF without WO? (From: Jesse Tayler <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use EOF without WO? (From: Amy Worrall <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: AjaxFileUpload
  • Next by Date: Re: Setting field value of object based on position in AjaxSortableList
  • Previous by thread: Re: Use EOF without WO?
  • Next by thread: Re: Use EOF without WO?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread