Re: [OT] Play! Framework
Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- Subject: Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- From: Joe Little <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:25:03 -0800
Grails is more similar to WO than Play though -- especially
considering GORM approaches some of the niceties of EOF and Wonder
qualifiers. Both easier in the easy case, but harder when you have
multiple relationships (stuck with Hibernate criteria builders then)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Pascal Robert <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Le 2011-03-09 à 20:57, Mike Schrag a écrit :
>
>> of the non-wo java web frameworks, Play is the only one that ever looked interesting to me ... definitely inherits a lot of "remove the crap" from rails, which is nice. i haven't built anything with it, but it looked like a nice framework from the docs and examples.
>
> It even have a basic D2W-like system :
>
> http://www.playframework.org/documentation/1.1.1/guide7
>
>> ms
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>>> I saw a demo of the Play! Framework (http://www.playframework.org) at a conference today, and I must say that it's the first time that I saw something that I really want to try out. It seems like a good mix between Ruby on Rails and WO, so I was wondering if someone else here have tried out that framework? _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden