Re: [OT] Play! Framework
Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- Subject: Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:57:24 -0700
On Mar 13, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Ravi Mendis wrote:
>
> I recently evaluated a couple of these new app servers (for Scala) and i found Play! to be the slowest (in terms of scalability/concurrency)...considerably so.
> In fact i think Play! was slower than WebObjects...[though i can't remember for sure]
>
> IMO the primary motivation customers have for moving off WebObjects is its inability to perform in an increasingly multi-core processor world.
You are referring to the single EOF lock?
> If i were looking at something other than WO i would choose a platform that is more concurrent not less.
>
> i.e for me there wouldn't be any point in choosing Play! over WO...
>
> On 11/03/2011, at 3:23 AM, Pascal Robert <email@hidden> wrote:
>> I saw a demo of the Play! Framework (http://www.playframework.org) at a conference today, and I must say that it's the first time that I saw something that I really want to try out. It seems like a good mix between Ruby on Rails and WO, so I was wondering if someone else here have tried out that framework?
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden