• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink


  • Subject: Re: ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink
  • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:45:08 -0500

Done.

> sounds right
>
> On Nov 19, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>> I just found a difference between the URL generated by ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink. In SimpleBlog, I told ERRest that the primary key for a BlogEntry is the title instead of the primary key in the table. To do that, I created a BlogEntryRestDelegate class and:
>>
>> public Object primaryKeyForObject(Object obj, ERXRestContext context) {
>>   return ((BlogEntry)obj).title();
>> }
>>
>> public Object objectOfEntityWithID(EOClassDescription entity, Object id, ERXRestContext context) {
>>   NSArray<BlogEntry> entries = ERXQ.filtered(BlogEntry.fetchAllBlogEntries(ERXEC.newEditingContext()), ERXQ.is("title", id));
>>   return entries.size() == 0 ? null : entries.objectAtIndex(0);
>> }
>>
>> That's working fine for ERXRouteLink, the generated link is using the title instead of the primary key, so I get /WOWODC.html instead of /1.html. Life is good… until I use ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord, in that case, I was still getting 1.html.
>>
>> Where is the difference? ERXRouteLink use this to get the primary key:
>>
>> Object entityID = IERXRestDelegate.Factory.delegateForEntityNamed(record.entityName()).primaryKeyForObject(record, new ERXRestContext(record.editingContext()));
>>
>> ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord use:
>>
>> record.primaryKeyInTransaction()
>>
>> which at the end of the chain, calls ERXEOControlUtilities.primaryKeyObjectForObject. I changed locally the code so that actionUrlForRecord use the same logic as ERXRouteLink and it works fine, so anyone have a problem if I commit that change to Wonder?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: null pointer maven create project (Mr. G Brown)
  • Next by Date: Re: Sencha Touch?
  • Previous by thread: Re: ERXRouteUrlUtils.actionUrlForRecord vs ERXRouteLink
  • Next by thread: Sencha Touch?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread