• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Does wonder have a standard User framework?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does wonder have a standard User framework?

  • Subject: Re: Does wonder have a standard User framework?
  • From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:10:27 -0700
No.  I think it's just because there's no one size fits all when it comes to user management.

ERCoreBusinessLogic handles user preferences in a mostly user agnostic way.  The only assumption it makes is that your user/actor has a single int PK.

I have an auth framework available on github, but even there I don't tie anything to a specific user class.  The user exists in the example project just to demonstrate usage of the auth framework.

Ramsey


On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:57 AM, James Cicenia wrote:

Just wondering...

You know the usual.. 

login/password/email reminder/basic profile

Cheers
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Does wonder have a standard User framework? (From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Raw Rows boolean attribute problem
  • Next by Date: Re: Does wonder have a standard User framework?
  • Previous by thread: Does wonder have a standard User framework?
  • Next by thread: Re: Does wonder have a standard User framework?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread