Apple

On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Michael Gargano <email@hidden> wrote:

I had seriously looked into it. it's a nice technology, but the documentation isn't the greatest and there's a lot of change happening now since strobe, inc. was purchased by Facebook. for those reasons and the fact that there's not much of a component library I went with Ext-JS. as for managing 200k+ lines of js, it's one of my biggest concerns. I'll let you know how it goes. there are a few eclipse plug-ins that provide some autocompletion, but they're not great.

-Mike

On Dec 19, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Johnny Miller <email@hidden> wrote:

Speaking of ember/sproutcore. Is anybody besides Apple using it on this list?

The promise seems really cool but like the article states - how do you maintain 200K lines of _javascript_? And what do you use for an IDE?

After Googling it for a while I found that some people are using WebStorm (which is a wonderful HTML + JS + CSS editor - best I've used to date) but there is no specific SproutCore plugin that I can find. It just seems like writing a client in SproutCore is a much more arduous task than creating components with WOLips.

Sorry to derail the conversation but I've been wondering about this for a while and I've love to get the opinion of senior programmers and people who have used it with WO.

Aloha,

Mr. Johnny Miller
Web Development Manager
Kahalawai Media Company
Lahaina, HI 96761
tel: (808) 661-7962 | mobile: (808) 283-0791
website | e-mail

On Dec 19, 2012, at 9:30 AM, email@hidden wrote:

Preaching to the converted, but worthwhile read all the same.

http://zef.me/4235/pick-your-battles

d

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>Great argument for the continued use of WO/WOnder (From: email@hidden)
	>Re: Great argument for the continued use of WO/WOnder (From: Johnny Miller <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Great argument for the continued use of WO/WOnder (From: Michael Gargano <email@hidden>)