Re: Opening multiple database channels
Re: Opening multiple database channels
- Subject: Re: Opening multiple database channels
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:06:42 -0400
Yeah, and you're already "inside the lock" at that point.
ms
On Mar 22, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I can only see them being of use in a very, very narrow set of circumstances - none of which I have ever been in (like fetching inside of awakeFromFetch). The only situation in which I have seen EOF attempt to open a second was in response to a bug. :-)
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On 2012-03-22, at 8:02 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> yeah, having multiple channels has to be locked by the store, because they are sharing a common set of snapshots ... you need multiple OSC's if you want multithreading. the only thing multiple channels is going to give you is headaches, it seems like.
>>
>> ms
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so... my first question has to be "what is your goal? What are you trying to accomplish?" This is NOT going to make EOF multi-threaded.
>>>
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2012-03-22, at 7:34 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking at trying to open multiple database channels in a single instance of a WO app. No reason, just wondering if it can be done. I know there's ERXObjectStoreCoordinator pool, but this conceptually seems like the wrong way to do it. Maybe I want 4 open connections for one database, but only one on another… whatever. So I have a look at
>>>>
>>>> https://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/WebObjects/Enterprise_Objects/Connecting/Connecting.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001011-CH210-TPXREF145
>>>>
>>>> and this seems to be the answer to my question. Well, until I try it. It turns out that inside of objectsWithFetchSpec on EOEditingContext, the objectstore is locked before a fetch takes place. As a result, no other fetch can proceed until the object store is unlocked. The answer seemed suspicious in the fact that it's being done on the Session anyway...
>>>>
>>>> So, I guess my question boils down to… is it even possible? Is this the 'single EOF lock' that Chuck Hill and Ravi Mendis were referring to in a previous list message?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ramsey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
>>>
>>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
>>> http://www.global-village.net/gvc/practical_webobjects
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
> --
> Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
>
> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
> http://www.global-village.net/gvc/practical_webobjects
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden