Re: WONettyAdaptor
Re: WONettyAdaptor
- Subject: Re: WONettyAdaptor
- From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:54:55 -0700
In the testing I've done, I haven't noticed a great difference in performance between it and the default. But it's easier to do websockets with the WONettyAdaptor which might be reason enough to use it.
On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
> I am considering using it with a direct action app. No file uploads.
> Is it reliable? More efficient?
>
> Thanks Ramsey,
> Ricardo
>
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> At least one gotcha. It's limited to 100Mb file sizes at the moment.
>>
>> Ramsey
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do you all recommend using WONettyAdaptor over the WODefaultAdaptor?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden