Re: @Override of EO?
Re: @Override of EO?
- Subject: Re: @Override of EO?
- From: Jesse Tayler <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:39:46 -0400
it likely should be another way entirely, but I don’t think the primary key would be already set at that time unless I saved changes during the relationship setter which might be both dangerous and obtuse.
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden> wrote:
> the awake method may be better, but shouldn't this be
>
> but you would have to override the original signature.
>
> public void setPoster(com.something.Poster value) {
> NSLog.out.appendln(" com.something.Poster this is the override " + value);
> takeStoredValueForKey(value, _Poster.POSTER_KEY);
> }
>
> I just played with this and it works. But I'm willing to bet there is a good reason (that I don't know) not to do it.
>
> Ted
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Jesse Tayler <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have an override of a normal EO setter, but for some reason, it isn’t called but the value does get updated
>>
>> I really just want to fire off a unix process once a new posterId has been set, so maybe there’s a smarter way but I thought this would be reliably called once and only after there’s a known primary key id for that poster (ERAttachment)
>>
>> Any thoughts on that?
>>
>>
>> @Override
>> public void setPosterId(Integer value) {
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden