Re: Instances limit per host?
Re: Instances limit per host?
- Subject: Re: Instances limit per host?
- From: Musall Maik <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:53:30 +0200
Am 09.11.2012 um 19:35 schrieb Pascal Robert <email@hidden>:
> FYI, I took the SiteConfig.xml from the server, and I moved it to a new CentOS 5.6 VM, and replaced the path for all instances/applications to be the same .woa bundle. I can add new instances without any problems, but it have a really strange behaviour.
>
> Let's say I have Application1, Application2 and Application3, all three points to the same .woa. Application2 have auto-recover on, so it started. But Application1 and Application3 doesn't start, and JavaMonitor throws:
>
> 2012-11-09 10:30:10,978 WARN 13.23 MB/5.8 MB [main] logging.ERXNSLogLog4jBridge (ERXNSLogLog4jBridge.java:43) - Application 'Application1-1' on wotaskd.conatus.lan:2004 stopped running at 2012-11-09 18:30:10 Etc/GMT.
> The app's current state was: STARTING.
> The app did not respond for 63478405690seconds which is greater than the allowed threshold of 120000 seconds (Lifebeat Interval * WOAssumeApplicationIsDeadMultiplier) so it is assumed to be dead.
> The last successful communication occurred at: 1-04-25 00:00:00 Etc/GMT. This may be the result of a crash or an intentional shutdown from outside of wotaskd
>
> But even weirder, I can add instances of Application2 and… they start just fine! I do remember that in the past (years ago), I was able have multiple applications pointing to the same .woa and it worked fine.
I had the same wotaskd log today, but on a OS X 10.8.4 server. By googling the error message I found... this thread!
Turned out the webobjects installation was somehow broken, reinstalling the WO runtime fixed it, in my case.
Maik
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden