Re: eo abstract classes and sequences
Re: eo abstract classes and sequences
- Subject: Re: eo abstract classes and sequences
- From: Baiss Eric Magnusson <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:19:13 -0700
On Mar 22, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Jürgen Tabert <email@hidden> wrote:
> But this leads to the question why the Entity Modeler generates the useless sequences for the subclasses
> and omits the sequence for the abstract class. If no table name is defined on the abstract class the runtime uses the class name to create the
> needed sequence.
>
> In my case the Entity Modeler can't generate a table for the abstract class because I didn't define a table name. There will never be an entity
> of this class.
You ought to be able to define a name, the abstract super-class can be thought of as a template for the sub-class construction in EOF. The fact that you worry about that name generating an additional <table.> in relationship expressions is a different problem.
>
> Jürgen
Baiss Eric Magnusson
cascadewebdesign.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden