• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads


  • Subject: Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads
  • From: Henrique Prange <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:25:45 -0300

Hi Paul,

I've refactored the report generation in one of applications lately to use a background task. A few lessons that I learned:

1) Do not create the editing context you're going to use in the background task during the request-response cycle.

2) Do not pass EOs to the background task. Only EOGlobalIDs.

3) Do not reference the WOSession, WORequest, WOContext from the background task.

4) Create a new WOResponse to return the report.

5) You can pass a Map as parameter when generating Jasper reports. I don't how this could relate to your need to perform a dictionary preparation.

I also had trouble locking the editing context in the background task, but I have no recommendation on this subject. You must check how your application behaves.

In the end, we have created a project (that is probably going to became open source) to handle the report generation. You can take a look here [1] for some inspiration related to Jasper data sources. Please, be gentle. The code is available but it's not completely polished. :)

[1]https://github.com/hprange/woreports/tree/master/src/main/java/com/woreports/jasper

Cheers,

Henrique

On 26/09/2013, at 02:35, Paul Hoadley <email@hidden> wrote:

Hi Chuck,

On 26/09/2013, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Hill <email@hidden> wrote:

How about passing in an array of EOs as EOGlobalIDs and a dictionary of EOGlobalIDs to whatever prepared data (user info) you need?

That's a good idea.  It still looks like I'll need to abandon the idea of making it sufficiently general to add to ERJasperReports.framework, though.  (Since needing to pass in such a dictionary as well seems like a pretty specific requirement, not to mention the issue of what to do with it once it arrives.)  And at that point, I may as well make it completely specialised, including performing the dictionary-preparation steps in the background task.


-- 
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/


Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads
      • From: Paul Hoadley <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads (From: Paul Hoadley <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: d2w query question
  • Next by Date: Re: d2w query question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads
  • Next by thread: Re: Clarification on passing EOs to background threads
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread