Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]
Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]
- Subject: Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:48:28 +0000
- Thread-topic: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]
|
As Johann indicated, you don’t need wotaskd running in order for the requests to get from Apache to the app. You do need something to start them. And if you want to stop them with a Web UI and have scheduling, crash notification etc, then Monitor and
wotaskd are something that works.
Chuck
On 2014-10-26, 9:13 AM, "Tom Woteki" wrote:
All:
Contrary to Chuck’s remark, I was not able to unload wotaskd and still have the successful configuration I posted elsewhere in this thread continue to work. Whereas I have dispensed with mod_webobjects I still require both the WOMonitor and wotaskd daemons
running.
Tom
On Aug 12, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Chuck Hill < email@hidden> wrote: You don’t need wotaskd (at the cost of instant reconfiguration) and you are not dependant on having mod_webobjects compiled for the Apache version and platform that you are using.
Chuck
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden