• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source


  • Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:26:09 -0500

> Le 2015-02-05 à 02:55, OC <email@hidden> a écrit :
>
> On 5. 2. 2015, at 7:14, Troy Lumasag <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being as it is now?
>> I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
>
> 0. no ObjC support. To get at least a remotely similar productivity, I've successfully managed to use Groovy with WO, but still it is a royal PITA; whilst Groovy is worlds better than Java, it's still far from ObjC.

Use GNUWebStep if you want ObjC.

>> 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions)
>> 2. single-threaded editing context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup?
>
> 3. weird bugs the source of which it is quite difficult to find, without having an access to sources (or a support who has). I'm still rather anxious about the Case of Mysteriously Deleted EOs, see http://prod.lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2014/Nov/msg00163.html
>
>> Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha
>>
>> --Troy
>>
>> On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:
>>> WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening because it is a internal business advantage.
>>>
>>> Tim Worman
>>> UCLA GSE&IS
>>>
>>>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Apple cares about money, not us.
>>>> Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... oh, wait.
>>>>
>>>> Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.
>>>>
>>>> (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.
>>>>
>>>> (ii) then they stop bundling it.
>>>>
>>>> (iii) then they stop supporting it at all.
>>>>
>>>> All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put it to open source at the same moment?!?
>>>>
>>>> The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to public (see Darwin).
>>>>
>>>> Oh, sigh.
>>>>
>>>> About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks pastime :)
>>>>
>>>>> - hugi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The github is here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>>
>>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >[OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: OC <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Timothy Worman <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Troy Lumasag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: OC <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: force-reload component templates to running app?
  • Next by Date: prepareForSaveWithCoordinator: Cannot save the object with globalID / row does exist
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • Next by thread: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread