• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?


  • Subject: Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:45:39 +0000
  • Thread-topic: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?

It is more likely that the EC got reverted after the insert and your code still has a reference to the EO, or the EO got deleted and your code still has a reference to it.  Can the users backtrack?  I’ve seen this sort of thing caused by backtracking.  It is usually unexpected code paths, rather than obviously incorrect code.

Chuck


On 2015-01-21, 12:20 PM, "OC" wrote:

I believe you both, but my problem is

(a) far as I remember, I create my EOs using EOUtilities.createAndInsertInstance, exclusively;
(b) since my memory is not reliable, I've used grep, and there's not one "new DBRecord" nor "new DBAuction" in my whole project
(c) I happen to override toString for my EOs and log the EC there, and in my logs, there's not one null EC.

Actually the (very probably, can't be entirely sure from the log) offending DBRecord has been logged out shortly before the NPE, with null PK (for it was newly created, which makes sense), and... a non-null EC.

That all said, of course it is still possible I've got either a DBRecord or its related DBAuction with null EC due to some strange bug, but darn, it's weird :-O

Thanks a lot,
OC

On 21. 1. 2015, at 18:26, Chuck Hill <email@hidden> wrote:

I am pretty sure that Hugi is right here.
On 2015-01-21, 6:04 AM, "Hugi Thordarson" wrote:
Are you sure your object is in an editing context?
Cheers,
- hugi
// Hugi Thordarson
// http://www.loftfar.is/
// s. 895-6688
On 21. jan. 2015, at 14:01, OC <email@hidden> wrote:
Hello there,
how on earth can this happen?!?
===
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject.willReadRelationship(EOCustomObject.java:1270)
at er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord.willReadRelationship(ERXGenericRecord.java:380)
at com.webobjects.eocontrol._EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary$Initializer$_LazyGenericRecordBinding.valueInObject(_EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary.java:614)
at er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord$TouchingBinding.valueInObject(ERXGenericRecord.java:209)
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject.storedValueForKey(EOCustomObject.java:1634)
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject$storedValueForKey$0.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallCurrent(CallSiteArray.java:49)
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject$storedValueForKey$0.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
at model._DBRecord.auction(_DBRecord.groovy:61)
===
The _DBRecord thing is one of the pretty old legacy parts, standard EO code as generated in an Eclipse project by its eogenerator, as it used to work a couple of years ago when I used Eclipse the last time:
===
  public static final ERXKey<model.DBAuction> AUCTION = new ERXKey<model.DBAuction>("auction");
...
  public static final String AUCTION_KEY = AUCTION.key();
...
  public model.DBAuction auction() {
    (model.DBAuction)storedValueForKey(_DBRecord.AUCTION_KEY) // <== line 61
  }
===
The relationship should be nonempty, but even if it was empty, it should simply return null from storedValueForKey, and not NPE?!? :-O
Thanks for any insight,
OC
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?
      • From: OC <email@hidden>
References: 
 >NPE in storedValueForKey?!? (From: OC <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!? (From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!? (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!? (From: OC <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: need a popup button with categories
  • Next by Date: Re: need a popup button with categories
  • Previous by thread: Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?
  • Next by thread: Re: NPE in storedValueForKey?!?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread