• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?


  • Subject: Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
  • From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:41:46 -0700

If the instance is hung, I’d start with

jstack -F <pid>

That should give a stack trace on whatever deadlocked it.

On Jan 27, 2015, at 2:33 PM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:

> Hello there,
>
> another weird case: this application is run single-instance (but ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool.maxCoordinators=3, WOAllowsConcurrentRequestHandling=true).
>
> Yesterday after 14:10 users reported “No instance” or “Application not found” WO reports. Now, I log all R/R loops in Application.awake and Application.sleep; indeed at 14:10 a R/R loop did start and never ended, actually, almost nothing happened till the app was restarted by the administrator at 14:20. (I am told JavaMonitor has not been able to stop the instance normally, and it had to be killed/force quit.)
>
> The single thing which did happen looks like this in my log:
>
> ===
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ////// R/R loop #2218 WorkerThread118 started at 14:10:05 26.1.
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> DA: reading CZ banner image for market 1000001...
> 14:20:39.844 WARN  Force Quit received. Exiting now...       //log:NSLog [Thread-3]
> APPLICATION SHUTDOWN SEQUENCE COMPLETE
> ===
>
> The “reading banner“ log comes from a direct action:
>
> ===
>    WOActionResults bannerAction {
>        def mpk=request().formValueForKey('mkpk'),lang=request().formValueForKey('lang')
>        println "DA: reading $lang banner image for market $mpk..."
>        if (!mpk || !lang) return null
>        ERXEC ec=ERXEC.newEditingContext()
>        DBMarket market=EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue(ec,'DBMarket',mpk as Integer)
>        println "DA: ... $market" //*
>        if (!market) return null
>        def mime=market."marketBannerMIME$lang",data=market."marketBannerData$lang"
>        println "DA: ... mime '$mime' data $data.length B"
>        WOResponse wor=new WOResponse()
>        wor.setHeader(mime,"content-type")
>        ...
>        wor.setContent(data)
>        wor
>    }
> ===
>
> Note the //* log is not present, which suggests that EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue did lock somehow?!? Neither any other R/R loop starts, which looks like not only WorkerThread118 did block, but that the instance stopped accepting requests at all.
>
> The FrontBase log (which I regret to say I do not fully understand, namely, those “--N lines, of which I get just the timestamp”) looks like this:
>
> ===
> ...
> --6 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.53996 "1 0"
> --D 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55851 752 48429
> SELECT t0."C_AUCTION_AMOUNT_STEP", t0."C_AUCTION_AOFFALL", t0."C_AUCTION_MAX_AMOUNT", t0."C_MAX_LENGHT", t0."C_AUCTION_MIN_AMOUNT", t0."C_AUCTION_CHDELAY", t0."C_MIN_LENGTH", t0."C_AUCTION_MINSTART", t0."C_AUCTION_NEXT_SEQ", t0."C_AUCTION_CONCUR", t0."C_CREATION_DATE", t0."C_CREATOR_ID", t0."C_FIELD_IDENTIFIERS_FOR_EDITOR", t0."C_FIELD_IDENTIFIERS_FOR_FILTER", t0."C_FIELD_IDENTIFIERS_FOR_LIST", t0."C_FIELD_IDENTIFIERS_FOR_OFFER", t0."C_FIELD_IDENTIFIERS_FOR_PUBLIC", t0."C_FORM_TEMPLATE_ID", t0."C_MARKET_BANNER_CZ_DATA", t0."C_MARKET_BANNER_EN_DATA", t0."C_MARKET_BANNER_CZ_MIME", t0."C_MARKET_BANNER_EN_MIME", t0."C_SUPPORTS_OFFERS", t0."C_SHORTCUT", t0."C_TITLE", t0."C_UID", t0."C_WIDTHS_FOR_LIST" FROM "T_MARKET" t0 WHERE t0."C_UID" = 1000001;
> --6 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55903 "1 0"
> --7 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55905 ""
> --8 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55907 "1"
> --2 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55976 7 48430
> commit;
> --6 0x1039f41d8 0x1039f44b0 2015-01-26 14:10:05.55984 "1 0"
> --3 0x1040841d8 0x1040844b0 2015-01-26 14:20:40.50016
> ...
> ===
>
> If anybody can see what on earth might have happened, I'd be grateful for any advice. Myself, I just can see the app locked _somehow_ and stopped working at all, but have no idea why and how to prevent that...
>
> Note: the direct action worked flawlessly (and is in the logs) in the same instance each previous R/R loop, more than 2000 times.
>
> Thanks,
> OC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
      • From: OC <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application? (From: OC <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
  • Next by Date: Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
  • Previous by thread: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
  • Next by thread: Re: Might in some conditions EOUtilities.objectWithPrimaryKeyValue lock the application?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread