Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?
Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?
- Subject: Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?
- From: OC <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:33:22 +0100
Ramsey,
> Can’t really tell looking a pseudo code, but I’ll take a guess.
that's my very real code, just I've removed things unrelated (hundreds of lines) to keep it manageable -- if possible, removing them altogether, if not, at least replacing them by "... description ...". But what remained is copy/pasted from Xcode.
> Auto locking works on a single thread. You can’t pass EOs to a background thread. You need to pass EOGlobalIDs to your runnable constructor instead and then create your new ec on the background thread when you begin processing. Your constructor is passing full EOs and thus you are getting weird behavior.
Ha! That's a news for me. I thought passing EOs is all right, supposed I make sure the passed EO always gets translated to the background thread's EC using localInstanceIn.
Just to make sure I understand you properly: to fix my code, I should replace
>> ownerEO=ownerEO.localInstanceIn(ec)
by
ownerEO=ec.faultForGlobalID(ownerEO.editingContext().globalIDForObject(ownerEO))
and similarly, I should replace
>> old.localInstanceIn(ownerEO.editingContext()).owner=null // owned relationship -> will delete
by
ownerEO.editingContext().faultForGlobalID(old.editingContext().globalIDForObject(old)).owner=null
so that it works reliably, right?
Thanks a big lot!
OC
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:41 AM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> well, the last fixes seem to have helped, at least, so far no problem related.
>>
>> Today though I've found one new problem, (hopefully) unrelated -- an EO somehow lost its EC?!?
>>
>> The user can import CSV; since it takes a small eternity, the import runs in a background task. The code essential skeleton looks like this:
>>
>> ===
>> static ERXLongResponseTask csvTask(EOEnterpriseObject ownerEO) {
>> NSArray originalObjects=ownerEO.ownedObjects().clone() // note they are in old EC (legacy code reasons)
>> ERXEC ec=ERXEC.newEditingContext()
>> ec.lock() // do I really need to lock here?
>> try {
>> ownerEO=ownerEO.localInstanceIn(ec)
>> } finally {
>> ec.unlock()
>> }
>> def task=new ImportCSVTask(ownerEO:ownerEO, original:originalObjects)
>> task.start()
>> task
>> }
>> ...
>> class ImportCSVTask extends ERXLongResponseTask.DefaultImplementation {
>> EOEnterpriseObject ownerEO
>> NSArray original
>> def performAction {
>> try {
>> for (... CSV reader and parser, line loop ...) {
>> EOEnterpriseObject record=EOUtilities.createAndInsertInstance(ownerEO.editingContext(),"DBRecord")
>> println "-> $record"
>> record.owner=ownerEO
>> ... set up record contents from CSV fields ...
>> }
>> for (old in original)
>> old.localInstanceIn(ownerEO.editingContext()).owner=null // owned relationship -> will delete
>> ownerEO.editingContext().saveChanges() // line 237
>> } catch (exc) {
>> ... error management ...
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> ===
>>
>> For about zillion times, the code worked all right; nevertheless, today, saving crashed, and I've found this in my log (the <class@hasCode primaryKey EC> is my own overridden toString, which simply prints "/EC:this.editingContext()" or "/NULL-EC" in case this.editingContext()==null; note also 0x27fcc396==670876566):
>>
>> ===
>> ...
>> -> <DBRecord@278683965 PK:null N /EC:670876566>
>> ... 1500-odd more of similar ones ...
>> -> <DBRecord@653822193 PK:null N /EC:670876566>
>> ... 1500-odd more of similar ones ...
>> -> <DBRecord@1291010302 PK:null N /EC:670876566>
>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot obtain globalId for an object which is not registered in any editingContext, object: <DBRecord@653822193 PK:null N /NULL-EC>, databaseContext: com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext@8fea539, object's editingContext: null, databaseContext's active editingContext: er.extensions.eof.ERXEC@27fcc396
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext._globalIDForObject(EODatabaseContext.java:4660)
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext.databaseOperationForObject(EODatabaseContext.java:4767)
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext.recordUpdateForObject(EODatabaseContext.java:6076)
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext.relayAttributesInRelationshipSourceObjectDestinationObject(EODatabaseContext.java:4921)
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext.relayAttributesInRelationshipSourceObjectDestinationObjects(EODatabaseContext.java:4966)
>> at com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseContext.recordChangesInEditingContext(EODatabaseContext.java:6036)
>> at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOObjectStoreCoordinator.saveChangesInEditingContext(EOObjectStoreCoordinator.java:373)
>> at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOEditingContext.saveChanges(EOEditingContext.java:3192)
>> at er.extensions.eof.ERXEC._saveChanges(ERXEC.java:1179)
>> at er.extensions.eof.ERXEC.saveChanges(ERXEC.java:1102)
>> at er.extensions.eof.ERXEC$saveChanges$1.call(Unknown Source)
>> at others.ImportCSVTask.performAction(CSVImport.groovy:237)
>> ===
>>
>> Other threads did save other EC's meantime, but far as I can say, neither this temporary EC nor the objects created here were touched anyhow from other threads.
>>
>> As always, I'll be grateful for any idea what might lead to this abomination :-O
>>
>> Thanks,
>> OC
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden