• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently


  • Subject: Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
  • From: Steve Peery <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 22:30:09 -0500

Are you actually experiencing performance issues? If not, I would just use count == 0.

WebObjects is incredibly efficient and I would trust it to do the right thing until it doesn’t. It is easy to waste a lot of time trying to fix things that are not actually a problem.

You can always put it in a little method:

public boolean someRelationshipIsEmpty() {
	return someRelationship().count() == 0;
}

Then if it is an issue later, you can take care if it in one place.

Steve


> On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> but what about raw SQL? Instead of talking to the EO.
>
> Of course my methods always end up convoluted but I thought about putting a method on the EO that uses raw SQL to return the count of related objects.
>
>
>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 8:34 PM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I'd bet this must be a WebObjects 101, but I can't see the best answer: is there an efficient way of checking whether an eo.someRelationship is empty?
>>
>> So far I simply check eo.someRelationship.count==0, but that might fire a fault, which is not exactly efficient if the only need is to know whether the relationship is empty or not.
>>
>> Of course I could rig myself something like “if already fetched in, simply check array count; if still fault, fetch max one object and see whether there's any...”, but this looks like a ubiquitous task enough it simply _must_ be done already (and in a far better way than I would do it myself)?
>>
>> Thanks for any advice,
>> OC
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently (From: OC <email@hidden>)
 >Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently (From: Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
  • Next by Date: Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
  • Previous by thread: Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
  • Next by thread: Re: check whether a relationship is empty, efficiently
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread