Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel
Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel
- Subject: Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel
- From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:24:59 -0700
Thanks (as always) Chuck!
I tested out the URL approach and it works. I’m also connecting to port 3268
instead of 389 per this:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16412236/how-to-resolve-javax-naming-partialresultexception.
That’s solved everything for now and it looks like including the search base in
the URL is a somewhat standard way to go. I’m still gonna investigate some more
code-centric ways of handling it - seems less brittle.
JNDIAdaptor does not expose the search base attribute. It does expose the
connection dictionary - so I’m guessing you could read it and add a key/value
pair for the search base, which I think would update the wrapped DirContext.
Tim
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 11:56 AM, Chuck Hill <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Take a look at the JNDIAdaptor class. There are connection dictionary
> parameters in there, one of those might be what you want. Or can you specify
> that on the connection URL?
>
> Chuck
>
>
> From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>
> Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 at 11:43 AM
> To: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
> Cc: WebObjects Development <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel
>
> Using Wireshark, below is what I’m seeing for the two queries. The biggest
> difference right off the bat is that the WO/EOModel search seems to search
> ROOT as the base DN whereas the Apache DirectoryStudio is using
> “DC=adinstance,DC=ucla,DC=edu” as the base. The WO/EOModel search also
> appears to have additional objectClass ‘AND’ filters.
>
> Looks like my first guess was somewhat likely - I need to find a way to get a
> handle on the query and feed a base DN to my fetch in WO.
>
> It looks like this might be a way to set that:
> JNDIPlugin - base
>
> But I’m wondering if there is a way to set it once at the launch of an app
> and not have to set it again.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> From WebObjects:
> Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
> LDAPMessage searchRequest(2) "<ROOT>" wholeSubtree
> messageID: 2
> protocolOp: searchRequest (3)
> searchRequest
> baseObject:
> scope: wholeSubtree (2)
> derefAliases: derefAlways (3)
> sizeLimit: 0
> timeLimit: 3601
> typesOnly: False
> Filter: (objectClass=user)
> filter: and (0)
> and: (objectClass=user)
> and: 1 item
> Filter: (objectClass=user)
> attributes: 0 items
> [Response In: 8]
> controls: 1 item
> Control
> controlType: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2 (Manage DSA IT LDAPv3
> control)
>
> From Apache Directory Studio:
> Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
> LDAPMessage searchRequest(14) “DC=adinstance,DC=ucla,DC=edu" wholeSubtree
> messageID: 14
> protocolOp: searchRequest (3)
> searchRequest
> baseObject: DC=adinstance,DC=ucla,DC=edu
> scope: wholeSubtree (2)
> derefAliases: derefAlways (3)
> sizeLimit: 1000
> timeLimit: 0
> typesOnly: False
> Filter: (objectClass=user)
> filter: equalityMatch (3)
> equalityMatch
> attributeDesc: objectClass
> assertionValue: user
> attributes: 2 items
> AttributeDescription: cn
> AttributeDescription: objectClass
> [Response In: 2]
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Chuck Hill <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Try going through a proxy like Charles. Comparing what is sent from WO and
> from Directory Studio might highlight what is wrong. I am sure that I did
> this many years ago, but the details escape me. Microsoft’s standard is just
> a little…different.
>
> Chuck
>
> On 2017-07-21, 12:56 PM, "Webobjects-dev on behalf of Tim Worman"
> <webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden on behalf of
> email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I’m not using the model for authentication to AD, I’m intending to
> use simply to return EO's from AD. I’m encountering the error below when I
> simply try:
>
> ADUser.fetchAllADUsers(pageEditingContext());
>
> The WARN log seems to indicate that I can’t search objectClass “user.” But
> it is modeled and was reverse engineered. I’m unsure why that would be
> considering I haven’t had that issue before with other ldap services.
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> did you see this:
>
> https://www.slideshare.net/wocommunity/third-party-auth-in-webobjects
>
> I was looking to see if there was a video to go along with the slides but
> didn’t find one.
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Tim Worman <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Has anyone used the JNDI plugin to model Active Directory? I’ve used it with
> a lot of success with other ldap directories but I’m running into a problem
> with a pretty simple model (which I’m sure has to do with AD’s
> implementation).
>
> I reverse engineered our AD (Server 2016) instance with no problem - and only
> included Person and User in my model. However, when I try to do a simple
> fetch of all User (or Person) I get sth like:
>
> Jul 21 11:11:23 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] DEBUG NSLog - Waiting for
> requests...
> Jul 21 11:11:24 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] WARN
> er.extensions.eof.ERXModelGroup - Clearing previous class descriptions
> Jul 21 11:11:24 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] DEBUG NSLog - Context factory
> cache is already clear
> Jul 21 11:11:24 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] DEBUG NSLog - Connecting:
> {plugInClassName = "com.webobjects.jndiadaptor.LDAPPlugIn"; timeout = "3600";
> scope = "Subtree"; username = "CN="Application Server",OU="Service
> Accounts",OU=ETU,DC=gseisnet,DC=ucla,DC=edu"; authenticationMethod =
> "Simple"; password = "<omitted from log>"; serverUrl =
> "ldap://gseisnet.ucla.edu:389";; initialContextFactory =
> "com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory"; }
> Jul 21 11:11:24 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] DEBUG NSLog - Creating
> plug-in com.webobjects.jndiadaptor.LDAPPlugIn for JNDIAdaptor@1084219182
> Jul 21 11:11:24 GSEISNetTestApplication[54777] WARN NSLog - Cannot search
> (&(objectClass=user))
> [2017-7-21 11:11:24 PDT] <WorkerThread0> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException:
> [LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-0310021B, problem 2001
> (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of:
> ''
> ]; remaining name ''
>
> When I use Directory Studio to perform what appears to be the same search,
> filtering on objectClass user, I get the results I would expect. I’m using
> the same bind credentials in both as well. One guess I have is the search
> base, which I have set to the base DN in Directory Studio. Is there a way to
> get a handle on the JNDI adaptor and set the search base globally in case it
> isn’t right?
>
> Any other ideas? I know I’m probably off the reservation here.
>
> Tim
> UCLA GSE&IS
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Active Directory, JNDI, EOModel (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |