Re: Opinion on ERXKey type parameterization
Re: Opinion on ERXKey type parameterization
- Subject: Re: Opinion on ERXKey type parameterization
- From: Matthew Ness <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:11:55 +1100
Hi Paul and list,
I know when I make custom keys which are to-many, I specify the
collection in the key:
public static final ERXKey<NSArray<Bar>> BARS = ...
The template could express this also, but I've never made that change.
--
Matt
http://logicsquad.net
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017, at 03:10 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Say I have a ‘Foo' entity, with a to-many relationship ‘bars’ to a ‘Bar’
> entity. Every Velocity generation template I’ve ever seen will output
> something like:
>
> public static final ERXKey<Bar> BARS = new ERXKey<Bar>(“bars”);
>
> or, even better:
>
> public static final ERXKey<Bar> BARS = new ERXKey<Bar>(“bars”,
> ERXKey.Type.ToManyRelationship);
>
> But shouldn’t ERXKey there be parameterized as ERXKey<NSArray<Bar>>?
> Admittedly, I’m struggling to see where it would make a huge
> difference—but just for completeness?
>
>
> --
> Paul Hoadley
> http://logicsquad.net/
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden