• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?


  • Subject: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • From: "ocs@ocs" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:43:27 +0200

Hi there,

the EOEditing context doc pretty unequivocally says

===
By default, an editing context that has no shared editing context listens for
DefaultSharedEditingContextWasInitializedNotifications. If a notification is
posted while the context has no registered objects, the editing context sets
its shared editing context to the newly initialized default shared editing
context.
===

Should it apply for an ERXEC, too? I sort of inferred it would, but by my
testing, it does not seem so: an ERXEC I make (through
ERXEC.newEditingContext()) seems to adamantly stay without
sharedEditingContext, although the notification is posted all right (I have
observed it myself to be sure), and if there's a good ole EOEditingContext, it
indeed duly sets its sharedEC at the time.

Have I missed something of importance somewhere? The ERXEC documentation does
not say essentially anything of the sharedEC, far as I can say:

http://wonder.sourceforge.net/javadoc/er/extensions/ERXEC.html

In principle, I could work around the problem by setting the sharedEC to all my
ERXECs programmatically -- that works all right --, but it would be a lot of
work, with a danger I overlook something somewhere and got bit in the tender
parts by that...

Thanks,
OC

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: JDBC adaptor on RHEL 7 - Solved
  • Next by Date: EOFetchSpecification .fspec plist description?
  • Previous by thread: Re: JDBC adaptor on RHEL 7 - Solved
  • Next by thread: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread