One to many not nullifying when reverse is not marked for in-class generation
One to many not nullifying when reverse is not marked for in-class generation
- Subject: One to many not nullifying when reverse is not marked for in-class generation
- From: Robert Hanviriyapunt via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 06:01:15 -0500
Hi I did an experiment with my model where I had a one-to-many relationship
with a reverse. I had the nullify rule on the reverse to-many. When I delete
the one, the many were nullified. But then I thought to remove to-manys from
class generation to save from fetching the array of faults — I suppose it
worked, still not sure it was the right thing to do, esp as a modeling practice
under conditions where the to-many might be fairly large. Anyway, now when I
delete the one, the to-manys are NOT nullified! Any way to fix this other than
including the to-manys, or programmatically on validate for delete or something?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden