Re: There was an old thread about Ajax...
Re: There was an old thread about Ajax...
- Subject: Re: There was an old thread about Ajax...
- From: Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:37:43 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ingencys.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ingencys.net; dkim=pass header.d=ingencys.net; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yiv1eSkL5sgPkmf9EE7+tap7P3/esKNJZPNSGtMvNaw=; b=Ddd5irDPUjSnTceLtYo1OV7sZ/5DPzEhPdlNlLlYqf/zOSzR5vKyI28mIBDWhG8VJlDa/1ygAg/fEHqXB3eAPXJug521MyydA9+0aGHEpKD0zzFmkneBfekyDQmETW6/5ta5BskgDddvzd2pFJLmaaCY2Ny6gWINu0OVYRB6sEhOQn6Mc4AT3CVjB9d9QkKyYFSBTW+6sN2LmsivRbZUZQYKHM3RuStgB5hMbjf6IKjdz8MmcbZIIekwlzRNA0mrpqt4fq18T1EKDZ3rbiWtkf2Uw2WH0cq5ais23Eg76klqJi7pwBioHBpR9kxFBBtlsCoW7W8AqmIWmjc3hgANUw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DXSMj5qnndVU2qF5axk3VW5aTGewVexdiBsD1Rr1/n10kwRxiV5PSFQqr7wyVPv2hgb3zt4i3CubQyjqhg7yXLG9lro7uRtlJiHYPCsmTIChCuBW5YUADqrw6AlaZqhWTgduRqqd9LBUhF/ktL3A18gYg+3Djha/YC0w7d/p73eZNXaLHzsNLVP7ZDJGC2rvVkpCxZoKZRVrRkN29d0fWXsAtewV+M8emJpfsaR1CaxG8+awb2iAbIqesWQKaTQiFVvjXBUBtAWGyU3E051RFf/8dIHqfZCvh8NgA6FJJvkzG+U8N2wWCg72R94AM/ZJqJBGekUbBt066ycHhVQMfg==
- Thread-topic: There was an old thread about Ajax...
Hi,
All our new ui improvments are based on jQuery (more without than with
bootstrap) that’s why I’m looking for a new lighter way, as Google is more and
more attentive to the speed of websites.
Yesterday, I tried to rewrite AjaxModalDialog using both AjaxUpdateContainer
and jQuery ui dialog in order to reduce the subset of ajax components we use.
So far it work’s well and the users are saying it’s faster.
Maybe it’s a way to follow to gently migrate...
Jérémy
Le 30 oct. 2019 à 01:28, Paul Hoadley
<email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>> a écrit :
Hi Jérémy,
On 29 Oct 2019, at 17:48, Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev
<email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>> wrote:
To deal with ajax-back-end-requests, we currently use :
- AjaxModaDialog
- AjaxUpdateContainer
- AjaxUpdateLink
- AjaxObserveField
- AjaxSubmitButton
- AjaxLongResponse
How do you deal with Ajax ? Still use wonder with prototype ? Any new idea ?
We use a slightly different subset of components from Ajax.framework, probably
more like this:
* AjaxUpdateContainer
* AjaxUpdateLink
* AjaxSubmitButton
* AjaxFlickrBatchNavigation
* AjaxObserveField
We then use a bit of jQuery, and so always call jQuery.noConflict(). Some
projects require a workaround to play nicely with Bootstrap.
So we're using quite a limited subset of components, and no D2W, but we do mix
in jQuery and sometimes Bootstrap. I can't recall the last time we hit an issue
that couldn't be solved or worked around.
--
Paul Hoadley
https://logicsquad.net/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden