• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment


  • Subject: Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment
  • From: Maik Musall via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 07:19:06 +0200

Hi,

I can see this being set in an older installation here, but in many cases I
don’t even have an /etc/WebObjects directory, and I don’t recall ever setting
this property by hand.

We do have complex setups with apache on different hosts than wotaskd, but it
is sufficient to set the IP addresses of the wotaskd hosts in the apache
adaptor config file to reach them. However, we do not have applications on
hosts with no local wotaskd, so maybe that’s the one case where this would be
necessary?

Maik


> Am 06.05.2025 um 04:05 schrieb Paul Hoadley via Webobjects-dev
> <email@hidden>:
>
> On 5 May 2025, at 16:38, Hugi Thordarson via Webobjects-dev
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> quick question: When setting up a deployment environment you usually have to
>> set the property er.extensions.WOHostUtilities.localhostips (usually in
>> /etc/WebObjects/Properties) to ensure your applications accept incoming
>> admin requests from wotaskd.
>
> Is this only in the setting where wotaskd is on a different host? Because
> I've never done this, though we only deploy with wotaskd+JavaMonitor on the
> host running the app instances.
>
>> I'm still no security expert, so I'm just checking if anyone sees this as a
>> bad idea/security issue, or if this can be safely kept and merged into
>> Wonder.
>
> I'm no security expert either, but it seems reasonable as a default that you
> can override. What happens in the setting where someone doesn't currently set
> the property, though? That is, what default behaviour will you be changing,
> and how astonishing will this be?
>
>
> --
> Paul Hoadley
> https://logicsquad.net/
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment
      • From: Hugi Thordarson via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment (From: Hugi Thordarson via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment (From: Paul Hoadley via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: JavaXML.framework and Java 21 (and Eclipse)
  • Next by Date: Re: JavaXML.framework and Java 21 (and Eclipse)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment
  • Next by thread: Re: Regarding the "localhostips" property in deployment
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread