• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Raise-on-Focus
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Raise-on-Focus


  • Subject: Re: Raise-on-Focus
  • From: Randy Ford <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:08:02 -0600

On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 02:03  PM, Eugene Lee wrote:

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:59:40AM -0800, William Julien wrote:
:
: I work on a many X11 based systems. I find that the system works best
: with "focus follows mouse" and "click to raise". Just my $.02

The problem with choosing both of these options is that once a window
has the focus, the only way to raise to the frontmost position is to
click on some window widget/decoration, like the title bar.  But if the
title bar of the window with the focus is hidden behind another window,
how do you raise the original window?

Ooh, Ooh, can I spend my 2 cents?

I prefer click-to-focus, but not raise. I can click on border or title to raise. I can hit a meta-key to raise the window with focus. It didn't take much to get used to clicking on the border/title by "default" since much of the time I want raise and focus together. I get the best of all worlds: no cursor in the way, layer windows as I want with focus where I want, and can use meta-keys for almost all window manager interactions. ( I don't use emacs, so I don't normally have meta keys mapped to things other than the wm. Viva la vi. )

However, I'm not sure that Apple is going to put a lot of effort into helping me to work that way. I have a lot of other window managers from which to chose, or I can modify one however I want. I'm hoping that Apple provides two things with X11: help Mac-specific improvements, such as speed and cut/paste operations, get worked back into other open source projects, and, in MacOS 10.3 or 10.4, provide X11 as an integral part of OS X.

If Apple releases the source for the changes to X11, everybody who uses/likes X11 will benefit. Apple may not even have to release Quartz-wm code, although that would be preferable.

If Apple does make X11 an integral part of OS X, then their window manager will have to provide OS X-like mappings, not the ones that I'm used to. The target for that will be the common non-Unix-geeks. A "normal" user should be able to use X11 apps on the MacOS desktop without even recognizing that they are different from other OS X apps. I want focus and raise to be separate, but if Apple doesn't provide that for non-X11 apps, they wouldn't for X11 built into OS X: it would cause too much confusion.

If Apple releases the code for whatever improvements they make, all of my needs/wants will probably be met by other X-Servers/Window Managers. If they make X11 work just like the rest of OS X, my wife, kids, mother, and the corporate desktop users' needs will be met. I really don't see Apple, in the near future, trying to make Quartz-wm into the be-all-and-end-all window manager for X11. If even a few of the customizations that X11 provides becomes part of the native OS X window manager, we will be better off than we are today.

I want to see Apple succeed at getting OS X with X11 on my family and friends desktops, as well as on the desktops of the corporate work centers where tens or hundreds of reps work. To do this, Apple will have to provide a consistent interface, not necessarily the most configurable one. By adding "native" X11, they open the door to the corporate desktop, and greatly increase the number of OS X apps available.

I've seen companies replace X-Terminals with PCs. It ain't pretty. The increased cost of maintaining the PC environment is staggering. If Apple continues down their path, they will be able to replace the PC and the X-Terminal economically. They must, however, be able to have an X11 experience that is seamless with the other OS X apps. They must also do it in a way that will minimize the required support. As much as I don't like the "any color as long as it's black" attitude, if done well, it can reduce the support costs.

randy.
_______________________________________________
x11-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/x11-users
X11 for Mac OS X FAQ: http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1232.html
Report issues, request features, feedback: http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Raise-on-Focus
      • From: Eugene Lee <email@hidden>
    • Re: Raise-on-Focus
      • From: Sebastian Hagedorn <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Raise-on-Focus (From: Eugene Lee <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: xwindows, xdarwin, xfree86, and x11
  • Next by Date: Re: xwindows, xdarwin, xfree86, and x11
  • Previous by thread: Re: Raise-on-Focus
  • Next by thread: Re: Raise-on-Focus
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread