• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
fink or no fink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

fink or no fink


  • Subject: fink or no fink
  • From: Jeff Jolley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:06:29 -0500

My question is: do I really need to install/use fink? (plus other post-fink questions...kinda rambly but I think it relates)

January 1998 - March 2001, I used Linux almost exclusively. Since 10.0, I've been an exclusive X-head (*OS*X-head). I've tried other X11's onX (including tenon's HORRIBLE Xtools). I'm very excited about X11.app. Since I used to build everything from scratch in linux, I decided to build the Gimp from source. There was a lot of GNU-stuff and libs that have to be built to get the Gimp to compile. But my thinking is once I do that, and go through the process of building Gnome and KDE, I've pretty much gone through all the installation process needed to get all core libraries for most X11 apps. But I check out lots of email lists and forums and I see NO COMMENTS AT ALL (well, maybe 1) about people downloading source and building on OSX+X11. Everyone says "fink...fink...fink" (please note: I'm not bashing fink).

I just like knowing that I've built the software for my machine and that I (probably) don't have library inconsistencies and such. But maybe w/ OSX+X11 it's not as simple as "./configure", see what's missing, build that source (maybe build a dependancy for the dependancy), "./configure ; make ; make install". Gimp WAS a pain to build.

I know that fink is basically dpkg and apt-get. I've never used a debian-based linux, just mandrake (rpm-based). I know that RPM has a problem knowing if you've installed something manually, rpm doesn't know about it.

(let's say I manually build glib-2.2.1, then want to RPM install something that requires it. I have to do some sort of -nodeps option to tell RPM to ignore checking that dependancy: or get the glib-2.2.1.rpm, install over my build, then install new pkg.)

Does apt-get/fink work in a way that will see what I manually build? Or will it just blindly download it's version of glib-2.2.1, force the install, then install the other package I want?

---jeff
_______________________________________________
x11-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/x11-users
X11 for Mac OS X FAQ: http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1232.html
Report issues, request features, feedback: http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: fink or no fink
      • From: Benjamin Reed <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Fink and Apple's X11 new site for beginners
  • Next by Date: /fink/bin/init.csh: No such file or directory
  • Previous by thread: Fink and Apple's X11 new site for beginners
  • Next by thread: Re: fink or no fink
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread