Re: Tiger emacs still x-crippled
Re: Tiger emacs still x-crippled
- Subject: Re: Tiger emacs still x-crippled
- From: Dave Schroeder <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:20:49 -0500
On May 4, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"P" == P T Withington <email@hidden> writes:
P> So, I was really hoping, that since X has been supported on OS X
for 2
P> + generations, that the Tiger emacs would finally have X
support. No
P> joy. fink emacs that worked on Panther blows up on Tiger. I
had to
P> force a rebuild to get it to work. But whyn't Apple have their
P> (optional) X package install an X-aware emacs?
I don't have tiger yet (waiting for Cisco VPN update), but
I hope that Carbon Emacs continues to build nicely. CVS HEAD
gets a daily workout from me.
And Carbon Emacs is far preferable to an X emacs.
Have we not yet established that anything relating to emacs (and text
editors at large) is a religious issue? Not only do people not agree
on which text editor to use, they disagree on which emacs variant to
use.
Perhaps we should all just agree on at least that point and realize
that no matter what Apple does, someone won't be satisfied? :-)
- Dave
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden