• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes


  • Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
  • From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:47:28 -0800


On 10 Nov 2007, at 20:04:10, Ben Byer wrote:

On Nov 10, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:

I realize that the "'Chinese Orange'- and Gray- Walls" of documentation published by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) are a thing of the past. It would be nice if Apple could publish, at least, documentation like the Release Notes, Administration Guide, and Users Guide published by Berkeley Software Design (BSDi) and to a lesser extent SuSE (SuSE/Novell).

I think Apple prefers the "Everything Just Works" way of doing things. That ... tends to break down when they don't.

Now you've done it, Ben. "Everything Just Works" is great marketing hype. The only product that I've used that this phrase might describe is BSD/OS. Mac OS X is approaching the mark but hasn't reached it yet.


It may have reached the "Everything Just Works" status for the average home and "Windows" users; however, after scanning the archives this afternoon, it's clear from the comments that this status hasn't been achieved for the "Unix" user.

Personally, I wouldn't mind paying an additional $50.00 for a "Professional" edition of Mac OS X that included real documentation about the underlying Mach Kernel and Core BSD environment.

Had Wind River not made the decision to abandon BSD/OS after acquiring BSDi, I would still be using a BSD/OS based system. But they did make that decision and my home system was in dire need of an upgrade. Apple's choice of components for their systems were similar to what I would select and a BSD environment was under the bonnet of Mac OS X. I selected Apple to replace both hardware and software environments.

My primary complaint is with the paucity of adequate Mac OS X documentation: both the printed variety and the man pages that appear to be outdated versions of those included in UC Berkeley's last BSD release.


Merton Campbell Crockett email@hidden



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
      • From: Ben Byer <email@hidden>
    • Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
      • From: Dave Schroeder <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes (From: Ben Byer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: X11 OpenGL and Wine
  • Next by Date: Re: Building Xephyr and Xsdl - X11's libGL
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
  • Next by thread: Re: Mac OS X 10.5: X11 Documentation/Release Notes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread