• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found


  • Subject: Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
  • From: "James K. Lowden" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:07:26 -0500

On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 17:00:48 +0000
Chris Jones <email@hidden> wrote:

> p.s. Just to add some background, the issue here is not specific to
> MacOS. Indirect GLX is in general being disabled by default in more
> and more places, for security reasons. Plenty of discussions on the
> web about it, e.g.
>
> <https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Xorg-IGLX-Potential-Bye-Bye>

I found

        https://lwn.net/Articles/625199/

more enlightening.

What a crock.

I understand shipping an OS with mail turned off, to the let the
administrator configure it before it's exposed to the Internet.  I
don't understand making X mysteriously less useful in the name of
security.

10 years ago, we had to switch from

        ssh -X
to
        ssh -Y

for security reasons.  "ssh -X" became mysteriously broken, and "ssh
-Y" was the fix.  So we run the same level of security using a different
option, because that's the only practical solution.  Lovely.

Turning off things like indirect GLX by default has the same effect.
Nothing is made more secure for the user who turns it on.  Anyone
who needs it will find out in a mysterious way: the software stops
working, weirdly, with no message to enable indirect GLX.  The user
is forced to dig through the X configuration docs -- or show up on
lists like this one -- to get back to status quo ante.

For my money, none of the exploits cited in the LWN article justify
inconveniencing a single user.  No one runs X under the illusion that
it's the very model of a modern secure system, and every noted problem
is directly fixable by introducing guards to verify
application-provided values.  Disabling the feature without fixing the
software smacks of officious bureaucracy; disabiling the feature after
fixing the software smacks of incompetent officious bureaucracy.

--jkl
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
      • From: Chris Jones <email@hidden>
References: 
 >libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found (From: Jay Salerno <email@hidden>)
 >Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found (From: "Schima, Frank (Fed)" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found (From: Chris Jones <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
  • Next by Date: Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
  • Previous by thread: Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
  • Next by thread: Re: libGL error: No matching fbConfigs or visuals found
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread