Re: Xcode dependencies
Re: Xcode dependencies
- Subject: Re: Xcode dependencies
- From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:41:01 -0800
On Nov 1, 2003, at 11:19 AM, Richard Young wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for the fast answer...
> They are all native now.
>
> I'll try to find the pattern and maybe doing simple projects to show
> that.
>
> Meantime, have you some recommendations, like (I don't wish is that)
> putting all headers (500) of all libraries (25) in all projects that
> use theses libraries. Currently we use include path (by the way
> interface to specifying includes path was better in PB than Xcode).
The Xcode native build system will do much better if you add the header
files to the target directly.
>
> Another topics... Can we force Xcode to always put relative path and
> not absolute one ? Each time someone add something, we got a
> nonfunctional project for other team worker.
Currently, Xcode can be very... stubborn about not allowing relative
paths with .. in them. Probably some time in the past there was a good
reason for this, but now it's just a bug that we need to fix. If you
want to increase the visibility of this bug, feel free to file a new
one.
Another way to tackle the problem is to define a 'source tree' path in
the Source Trees preference panel and then use that for the path type
after adding the file(s). Of course, if you add a source tree path,
then each user needs to define the same source tree in their settings.
Scott
>
> Richard Young
>
> Le 03-11-01, ` 13:33, Scott Tooker a icrit :
>
>> Just to double-check, you are using the new native build system (the
>> target icon for "classic" PB targets is a bullseye, while the new
>> native targets have icons that represent what they produce)? I just
>> ask since much work went into the native build system to improve
>> dependencies.
>>
>> If you are using native targets, please file a bug describing how the
>> dependency analysis is falling down (if you can provide a simple test
>> case that would make it much more likely that your bug would be
>> addressed quickly).
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Nov 1, 2003, at 9:52 AM, Richard Young wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am working on a big project, with other peoples (some in europe,
>>> others here). We have been forced to move from CodeWarrior to
>>> PB/Xcode because the CW was not able to link our application
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> The main problem of Xcode is that it is very very very slow... 2
>>> hours to compile the complete project. We will be able to manage
>>> with this, if it was not the other problem that combined with this
>>> one are insurportable.
>>>
>>> It seems that dependancy of files doesn't work well. We change a
>>> header and only some (dependant) files are compiled. So we often
>>> need to clean the project to force all files to compile.
>>>
>>> It there a way to make dependency to works under xcode ?
>>>
>>> Richard Young
>>> Abvent North-America
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.