• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 64 bits support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64 bits support


  • Subject: Re: 64 bits support
  • From: Scott Thompson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 09:30:40 -0600

I'm not sure what this means; can you clarify? Note, in particular, that Darwin does *not* have a microkernel architecture - it's a monolithic kernel.


Darwin is based on the Mach Microkernel which shares and address space with a BSD-like monolithic kernel. It should be possible, to replace the Mach VM-descended memory management processes with an alternative memory handler and that, in theory, might allow you to allocate larger blocks of memory.


It should be possible... I didn't say it would be practical. :-)


Even if you rewrite the memory handling, I believe (and anyone is welcome to correct me) but I believe you will still be limited to 56 bits.

The 56-bit thing is a physical capability for some latter-day G4's. This just allows the system to support more physical memory, and has no effect on what an individual process can directly access.

Unless, of course, you take control of the segment registers and VM tables yourself by rewriting the memory subsystem.


Scott
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 64 bits support
      • From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: 64 bits support (From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Xcode quits itself
  • Next by Date: Re: Xcode quits itself
  • Previous by thread: Re: 64 bits support
  • Next by thread: Re: 64 bits support
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread