• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework?


  • Subject: Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework?
  • From: "Timothy J. Wood" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:16:28 -0800

On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 11:08 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
Another option would be to cons up a dummy dylib for the framework that does get loaded, but doesn't expose any of the API's in the framework. This would suffice to locate the bundle and its associated resources. I think this would be a better option than trying to handle merging resources since avoiding duplicates could get tricky...

That's an interesting idea...

We'd still have to modify our source, though. The 'static library + copied resources' case makes sure that '[NSBundle bundleForClass:[MyClass class]]' will continue to work. We often use this to find resources associated with a particular class rather than looking up bundles by name.

-tim
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework? (From: Jim Ingham <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Xcode 1.01 crashes in debugger
  • Next by Date: Re: Removing a breakpoint?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework?
  • Next by thread: Re: Static Library Equivalent of a Framework?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread