Re: Exception handling
Re: Exception handling
- Subject: Re: Exception handling
- From: "Michael B. Johnson" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:51:33 -0800
Can anyone comment on why this isn't on by default? In other words,
what's the cost (execution speed or app size, or layout in address
space) of enabling this? I'd like to put it on by default for my
stuff, but I'm not sure if there are carrying costs like C++'s
exceptions...
On Oct 30, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Chris Hanson wrote:
On Oct 29, 2003, at 9:53 AM, Frank Midgley wrote:
To enable the new syntax, you must pass the '-fobjc-exceptions'
options to the ObjC/ObjC++ compiler, and/or set the
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable to "10.3".
In Xcode, to pass the option to the compiler you put it in
OTHER_C_FLAGS in the build info for a target.
-- Chris
--
Chris Hanson, bDistributed.com, Inc. | Email: email@hidden
Custom Mac OS X Development | Phone: +1-847-372-3955
http://bdistributed.com/ | Fax: +1-847-589-3738
http://bdistributed.com/Articles/ | Personal Email: email@hidden
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--> Michael B. Johnson, PhD
--> http://homepage.mac.com/drwave (personal)
--> http://xenia.media.mit.edu/~wave (alum)
--> Film On Line Lead
--> Pixar Animation Studios
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.