Re: time.h vs Time.h
Re: time.h vs Time.h
- Subject: Re: time.h vs Time.h
- From: Keith Ray <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 07:04:41 -0700
Both of your statements are like going to a mechanic, asking him to fix
your car, but telling him he's not allowed to open the hood or replace
any parts.
You may be able to use CodeWarrior - it can distinguish between <> and
"" includes if you set it up right.
On Aug 25, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Massimo Marino wrote:
I do not think you may install Xcode on UFS. If instead the suggestion
is to have a partition were to put source code would not work. Could
not tell OS X users to repartition their HD if they want to use Xcode.
It is supposed to work with C++ without the "caveat: watch how you
name your classes".
Renaming the code is also not a solution: it runs on Linux and
Windows. Asking to change MLOC to have it run on OS X and Xcode would
be just calling for killing OS X itself.
--
C. Keith Ray
<http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/blog/index.html>
<http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/xpminifaq.html>
<http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/resume2.html>
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.