• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: time.h vs Time.h
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: time.h vs Time.h


  • Subject: Re: time.h vs Time.h
  • From: Markian Hlynka <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:56:54 -0600

On Aug 27, 2004, at 15:37, Jim Ingham wrote:

I am pretty sure the header map is there to handle cases like building a new version of the AppKit framework on a system that already has one installed. In that case, you need to make sure that you pick up the headers from the NEW AppKit frameworks - which are local - and not the system ones, even though the includes are all through <> type includes. So I think the sort of rule you are suggesting would defeat the header map's main purpose.


that sounds reasonable, but it doesn't address the original problem, which is that xcode doesn't seem to implement <> and "" includes correctly.


Markian
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >time.h vs Time.h (From: Massimo Marino <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Keith Ray <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Massimo Marino <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Massimo Marino <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Massimo Marino <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Massimo Marino <email@hidden>)
 >Re: time.h vs Time.h (From: Jim Ingham <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: time.h vs Time.h
  • Next by Date: Re: time.h vs Time.h
  • Previous by thread: Re: time.h vs Time.h
  • Next by thread: Re: time.h vs Time.h
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread