Re: time.h vs Time.h
Re: time.h vs Time.h
- Subject: Re: time.h vs Time.h
- From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:23:20 +0100
On 27 Aug 2004, at 22:22, Massimo Marino wrote:
Still, Eric, MHO is that including an header with < > should somehow
force the USE_HEADERMAP=0 somehow for those headers in an automatic
way: Local headers, even in headermap, should never take precedence
over system ones.
Actually, this behaviour exists for a reason - I believe it is related
to the building of frameworks (so that framework-style includes will
search headers in the project in precedence for those installed, which
may either not exist or may be out of date).
However, I have heard that headermaps are going away at some point in
the future.
-- Finlay
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.