Re: asm-blocks: please tell me why I'm being thick :-)
Re: asm-blocks: please tell me why I'm being thick :-)
- Subject: Re: asm-blocks: please tell me why I'm being thick :-)
- From: Stan Shebs <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:52:43 -0800
Nigel Perry wrote:
Yes, it appears to *sometimes* get messed up with the "register int
loc1" - which is what I think this is. However other times it works,
and so far I can find no pattern as to when something will work and
when it won't. And given things like re-ordering the functions in a
file and break/fix assembler errors I'm being to think the whole
feature is implemented "interestingly" (as I would say to students on
my parsing course! ;-))
Yup, getting C and C++ parsers to care about newlines is the most
interesting of those parts!
Yes, in function asm blocks seem iffy as well :-(
I'm actually after the asm functions as they don't include a
prelude/postlude while the above does. For every simple functions
dropping these is worth it. However I'll take any reliable method!
Please report all the bugs you run into, I am working on fixing asm
block problems for a future tools release. But they don't let me
touch compiler sources without a bug report to justify it. 1/2 :-)
Stan
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.