• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Editor is really buggy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Editor is really buggy


  • Subject: Re: Editor is really buggy
  • From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:00:55 +0800

Hi Nick,

Thanks for your post.

On 31/05/2004, at 10:46 AM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
On May 30, 2004, at 2:49 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote:

I'd very much like too, but why do we still have the requirement that the developer tools MUST be on the same partition as the OS?

Because the Xcode installation puts a number of files into /System and /usr, and probably some other places. It's not just installing things into the /Developer folder. Some of the files that are installed expect their support files to be located at a specific path, so it's just not possible to move stuff around.

I'm sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. I realise it needs to install stuff within /System and elsewhere on the boot partition. However, this doesn't explain why it is unhappy with /Developer being a symbolic link onto another partition? As I mentioned, I have moved /Developer off the boot partition.


I actually chose the boot partition for the install (it allowed me to do that even though /Developer was not on that partition). The install completed without error but Xcode is still 1.1. I guess it just can't find the app across a symbolic link (must be trying hard to do that ;-) and so doesn't update the app itself.

Here's me thinking that 10GB would be a very fair size partition for an OS and developer tools, but now I'm struggling.

That was a fair estimate for earlier versions of Mac OS X (I ran the public beta through 10.2.8 on a 6 GB hard disk), but not anymore. And it'll probably get larger over time... I still remember when people were complaining that System 7 took a whopping 4 MB of disk space to install... We've come a long way since then.

Yes, things have changed. I am not too fussed about the size required, just that it is inflexible with regards to moving things onto other partitions (with appropriate symbolic links in place). Others have suggested mounts would work, but I like the flexibility of symbolic links and having to repartition is a real time waster for me.


Cheers,
Ashley.

--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Symbolic link & Xcode install
      • From: Philipp DonzĂ© <email@hidden>
    • Re: Editor is really buggy
      • From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Editor is really buggy (From: Dave Payne <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Editor is really buggy (From: David Ewing <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Editor is really buggy (From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Editor is really buggy (From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Editor is really buggy
  • Next by Date: Re: Editor is really buggy
  • Previous by thread: Re: Editor is really buggy
  • Next by thread: Re: Editor is really buggy
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread