Re: Weak linking framework with bundle ?
Re: Weak linking framework with bundle ?
- Subject: Re: Weak linking framework with bundle ?
- From: Mike Richmond <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:15:02 +0000
>> I'd strongly suggest using GCC 3.1 (or, better yet, 3.3) instead.
(For that matter, 3.1 and 3.3 are much better than 2.95.2 for many
other reasons. You shouldn't have a need for 2.95.2 at all.)
Yes, I hear that, but I've seen nothing to suggest that weak linking
> is not supported by 2.95.2, and it certainly works in some cases.
Should I be able to weak link a framework to a bundle at all (I assume
so as the tools let me try)? With 3.3? With 3.1? With 2.95.2?
The December 2002 tools included GCC 3.1 as the default compiler. That
or any subsequent compiler release should work. I can't speak for your
specific scenario -- I don't know anything about weak linking -- but
the technote probably means that it works with the default compiler in
that release. Maybe it's supposed to work with 2.95.2, but since it
doesn't seem to be working for you your best bet is to try a newer,
better compiler version.
I see exactly the same behaviour having rebuilt with GCC 3.3 as
shipped with XCode v1.5.
Mike Richmond
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden