Re: db acess
Re: db acess
- Subject: Re: db acess
- From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:44:05 -0500
Today, persistance to disk is very good, but to RDBMS, there are
proprietary solutions, but nothing like ADO.
Hence the huge hole for enterprise developers.
Andy
On Nov 28, 2004, at 4:24 PM, David Eddy wrote:
Andy Satori -
Andreas,
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but right now, this is a huge
hole in the Cocoa/Objective C world. I've been fairly vocal about
this. Enterprise Objects is an old NeXT technology, one that Apple
inexplicable dropped for the Mac OS X, except in the WebObjects Java
world. I own a copy of WebObjects, and while it's a nice technology,
it's not really the answer for the converted Windows developers.
Let me see if I understand this... I'm still struggling up the
Objective-C learning curve, and have wondered at the bland statements
of
"data is stored in the methods."
For textbook examples, that's ok, but the real world expects more.
Are you saying that actually using persistant datastores (e.g.
databases) is so far NOT in the Xcode/Objective-C picture?
[Asked thru the eyes & experience of a novice (on this platform).]
- David
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Re:db acess (From: David Eddy <email@hidden>) |