• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: leak detecting vs memory
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: leak detecting vs memory


  • Subject: Re: leak detecting vs memory
  • From: j o a r <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:03:16 +0100


On 1 dec 2005, at 22.24, David Dunham wrote:

Only 1.25 GB, but I would have thought there was plenty of VM available.
Oh wait, right after I typed that, it happened again. And there's still 2.74 GB free on the startup disk.

Dave's probably right though, are you not hitting the hard 3.5 - 4 GB max limit for 32 bit apps?Check the progress in top up until the crash.


j o a r


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >leak detecting vs memory (From: David Dunham <email@hidden>)
 >Re: leak detecting vs memory (From: j o a r <email@hidden>)
 >Re: leak detecting vs memory (From: David Dunham <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: leak detecting vs memory
  • Next by Date: Re: static / extern fails in GCC 4
  • Previous by thread: Re: leak detecting vs memory
  • Next by thread: Can gcc 4 built binaries be used on 10.2 to 10.3.8? (undefined reference to _fprintf$LDBL128 expected to be defined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread