• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Carbon with UNIX
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Carbon with UNIX


  • Subject: Re: Carbon with UNIX
  • From: Alexey Proskuryakov <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:02:48 +0300

On 17.01.2005 00:31, "Ian Krieg" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Apparently this is not exactly the reason.  I made a test file and had the
> same problem you did.  When I defined a struct of my own in the file, it could
> be used fine without the struct keyword.  I thought perhaps it was something
> about how the API headers were treated after being included, so I found an
> arbitrary struct in another header, "_pthread_handler_rec", but it worked fine
> without the keyword "struct".

  Here is a simpler test case (remember that stat is both a struct and a
function):

----------
struct aaa {};

int aaa();

int main ()
{
    aaa a;
}
----------

  Both gcc and Comeau dislike it. I don't know which paragraph of the
standard should be cited as a reason; but it definitely seems to be standard
behavior.

- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Carbon with UNIX
      • From: Robert Tillyard <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Carbon with UNIX (From: Ian Krieg <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Carbon with UNIX
  • Next by Date: Re: Carbon with UNIX
  • Previous by thread: Re: Carbon with UNIX
  • Next by thread: Re: Carbon with UNIX
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread