Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X

Subject: Re: Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X
From: "Peter O'Gorman" <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:58:35 +0900

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greg Hurrell wrote:

| 1. Make a Universal Binary (but the docs suggest this isn't possible).
|
| 2. Maintain two separate builds: a non-universal one for pre-Tiger
| versions of Mac OS X and a universal one for Tiger and up.
|
| 3. Abandon support for pre-Tiger versions of Mac OS X and force your
| customers to upgrade.
|
| 4. Forget native code and rely on "Rosetta".

If you really require support for 10.2 users, build ppc for 10.2 and x86 for
10.4 and use lipo to create a fat binary.

man 1 lipo

Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQqWoC7iDAg3OZTLPAQJQ3QQAs3sUBweBStRJ0YCm116vbXQ/R0UCDqGG
yZZjlZCj0twXkffbPwchuFQdWifYY1FIuhZS+nnFoY9nEwXW2sXEoWoUVQrUZJDr
pbyssYVf2vLXUY5j95NjZBv8AnOLSn2S1aCc6XZz/kpUGHgJc0FmyirXbf3G2eVC
+xKpPB3HaLg=
=VyYN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X (From: Greg Hurrell <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X

Next by Date:
XCode 2.1 - different result from crypt in deployment and debug?

Previous by thread:
Re: Universal binaries and older versions of Mac OS X

Next by thread:
XCode 2.1 - different result from crypt in deployment and debug?

Index(es):

Date
Thread