Re: Const correctness
Re: Const correctness
- Subject: Re: Const correctness
- From: Cameron Hayne <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:10:57 -0400
On 13-Jun-05, at 12:30 PM, David Fang wrote:
I used to be confused about it a long time ago. Someone
summarized in an earlier post: "const" modifies the thing to the
left. If
there's nothing to the left, then it applies to the right.
I think it is easier to just always read declarations from right to
left (* is read as "pointer to"):
const char* cs
cs is a pointer to a const char
char* const cs
cs is a const pointer to char
--
Cameron Hayne
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden