Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
- Subject: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
- From: Greg Hurrell <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:56:12 +0200
El 25/06/2005, a las 22:10, Alexey Proskuryakov escribió:
What makes you think so, the .ru domain of my e-mail address? ;-)
No, your defense of an English-centric display pattern in the user
interface does; I didn't even look at the domain.
As soon as Finder does that (and not only in its latest version,
but for a few years), perhaps. But this mailing list is about
Xcode, and I think that Xcode templates shouldn't be fixed earlier
than that.
Apple has been advising developers to use the ISO folder names for
years now. The sooner Xcode is brought into compliance with Apple's
long-standing recommendations the better, regardless of how long it
takes for them to implement a properly localized display in the Finder.
I don't know if Apple provides an API for moving back and forth
between the ISO codes and localized human-readable representations
of those codes (needless to say I think it should)
Hmm, good point... I don't see this functionality exposed as an
API - other than going straight to ICU, which isn't recommended.
Currently, I have no use for it in my code, but if you do, please
file an enchancement request. It is always better to provide
potential use cases and explain the need (there are some subtle
questions with such an API, which may explain why they haven't
exposed it).
I suspect they do have a private but not-yet exposed API which
they're using in the International preferences pane. That's a pretty
good example of a use case.
Cheers,
Greg
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden