• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Template static data members in GCC4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Template static data members in GCC4


  • Subject: Re: Template static data members in GCC4
  • From: Andreas Grosam <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 09:09:54 +0200


On 01.05.2005, at 01:30, Andrew Pinski wrote:


On Apr 30, 2005, at 7:04 PM, David Catmull wrote:

I'm having trouble with definitions of template static data members in GCC4. Here's a simple example:

    template <class T>
    class A
    {
        static T *x;
    };

    int *A<int>::x = 0;

GCC 3.3 accepts this, but GCC 4 says "error: too few template-parameter-lists" on that last line. If there are two few, what am I missing?

try: template<> int *A<int>::x = 0;

Otherwise your code is invalid. From GCC 3.4.x onwards, GCC is more compliant
to the C++ standard.



btw, you are using a template specialization.

You should also provide the template definition of the static member, e.g.:

template <Class T>
T* A<T>::x = 0;


You may use a specialization, if you want to initialize the static member with different values:


template<> short* A<short>::x = 1;
template<> unsigned int* A<unsigned int>::x = 2;


etc.


Andreas

-- Pinski _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden


This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: gcc_select
  • Next by Date: Re: Disable "missing [super dealloc] call" warning
  • Previous by thread: Re: gcc_select
  • Next by thread: Re: Disable "missing [super dealloc] call" warning
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread