• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work


  • Subject: Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work
  • From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:41:30 -0800

On Nov 18, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Dave Rehring wrote:

Assuming you mean the following, it does not work. I still get a 4
byte enum:

#pragma options align=mac68k
typedef enum
{
foo  = 0x10
} fooEnum;
#pragma options align=reset

So, is gcc 4 busted in regards to __packed__ and enums, or am I doing
something wrong?

Dave

Um, I wouldn't think __packed__ to have any effect on the size of enum's.
Isn't it just applicable to struct [and maybe class] layout?

I verified that pragma options align doesn't change the enum size in gcc 4.0.1, but I tried the following code:


typedef enum __attribute__ ((__packed__))
{
foo  = 0x10
} fooEnum;

int main(const char argc, const char* argv) {
        printf("%d", sizeof(fooEnum));
}

and got the desired "1" instead of the default "4".

Changing foo to 0x10000000 got the result 4 again.

__attribute__ ((__packed__)) is known not to work prior to gcc 4.0.0, so if you have the 3.3 compiler set, that may be your problem.

Chris

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work
      • From: Dave Camp <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work (From: Dave Rehring <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Namespace bug?
  • Next by Date: Re: Namespace bug?
  • Previous by thread: Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work
  • Next by thread: Re: [2.2] Cant get __attribute__ ((__packed__)) to work
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread