• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?


  • Subject: Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?
  • From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:22:34 -0700

On Apr 13, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Paul Russell wrote:

On 13 Apr 2006, at 10:32, Eric Albert wrote:

On Apr 13, 2006, at 2:16 AM, Peter wrote:

2) I would like to put extra settings for compiling G5 code,

 -mcpu=970 -mpowerpc64 -mpowerpc-gpopt -force_cpusubtype_ALL -DCPUG5

where can I put this settings or it is obsolete ?

That's obsolete. The architecture name you want is 'ppc64'. 'ppc970' gives you a 32-bit G5-specific binary.

I don't think it's obsolete - there are plenty of reasons why you might want a 32-bit G5-specific executable.


To answer the OP's question though, you can add these architecture- specific options under PER_ARCH_CFLAGS_ppc970.

I meant that the example is an obsolete way of building for 64-bit PowerPC. To build a 32-bit G5 executable, you can pass -arch ppc970, as I showed.


-Eric

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?
      • From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ? (From: Peter <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ? (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ? (From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Link errors
  • Next by Date: linking Fortran subroutines
  • Previous by thread: Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Help : Compiling for multiple architectures, is ppc970 valid ?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread